Shush, Honey

First off, right out of the gate, let me state categorically and unequivocally that this post has nothing whatsoever to do with any current news story. All similarities between the terms “Hush Money” and “Shush, Honey” are entirely coincidental. Got that, Alvin Bragg?  Good.

Second, I realize this post is probably going to offend at least half of my readership, maybe even more than half. For that I sincerely apologize in advance. Also, we’ll probably lose our PG-rating. On the flip side of the coin… GROW UP ya big buncha babies!  There. I feel much better now.  I do trust if any of this puts your knickers in a twist you’ll eventually get everything straightened out. After all, hope springs eternal. Also this: Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Now, let’s proceed with a visual, shall we? And you get to decide who it is. No, the correct answer is neither “Marilyn Monroe” nor “Monica Lewinsky.” If you guessed either of those esteemed past presidential consorts, I say to you, “Nice try, but no cigar.”

 

Shush, Honey
If there are children in the room, you may want to shade their eyes.

 

Now then, moving on…

 

The following item which I found quite enlightening is lifted from a periodical I can’t, for contractual reasons, publicly name – but you’ve probably heard of it. And if you’d like to read it in full and in situ, you can do so, here. For convenience sake, I’ve plagiarized it in its entirety, below. (You’re welcome.) And should anyone desire to take me to task – or, Allah forbid, to sue me – please leave your attorney’s name along with a self-addressed stamped envelope in the comments section. In the event that we here at dewconsulting.net find fit to pay you off – you know, so as to make any alleged unpleasantness disappear – a Swiss bank account number would also be most helpful. Thanks. Glad we got all that out of the way up front. And now, on with the show.

 

********

 

Is it a stretch to submit that Donald Trump faces a looming indictment for mishandling a payoff to the porn star Stormy Daniels and not, say, for inciting an insurrection, because the Daniels case has an obvious tagline? Pick any news outlet — Times, Fox, Breitbart: It’s always the “hush-money case.” Here’s a concept you can sell. Epsteins, Weinsteins, Charlie Sheens. It’s easily comprehensible, onomatopoeic. Hush. The term is sultry, lubricious; typically what’s being hushed is evidence of sex. Unlike the confidential legal settlement or the corporate N.D.A., hush money carries a whiff of the entrepreneurial. When Joseph Addison and Richard Steele started The Tatler, in 1709, they courted it. “I expect hush-money to be regularly sent for every folly or vice any one commits in this whole town,” Steele wrote. He was the first to employ the term but not the practice; for about as long as people have been saying stuff, others have been paying them not to. In Genesis, the King of Gerar tries to seduce Abraham’s wife, then pays him off with sheep, oxen, and servants. The King calls it “a covering of the eyes.” See nothing, say nothing.

 

What’s the going rate these days for silence? Inflation doesn’t compute precisely for sheep and oxen. Michael Jackson paid two hundred million. Bill Cosby paid three and a half, Bill O’Reilly forty-five. The sum depends on what you’re trying to hush up. When Bette Davis’s husband recorded her in bed with Howard Hughes, she paid him seventy-five thousand dollars to keep it private. Jerry Falwell, Jr., provided the pool boy, whom Falwell liked to watch in bed with his own wife, with around two million. (Michael Cohen, Trump’s fixer, helped broker a deal.) Rudy Giuliani, in his capacity as Trump’s lawyer, once offered a mathematical model. “I never thought a hundred thirty thousand was a real payment,” he said, of the sum Trump paid to Daniels. “It’s a nuisance payment. When I settle it as real or a real possibility, it’s a couple million dollars.”

 

“That’s a preposterous statement,” the victims’-rights lawyer Gloria Allred said last week, when solicited for an expert opinion. “It’s not like buying a car.” A few years ago, Allred was criticized in the Times for negotiating a confidentiality settlement between a client and Harvey Weinstein. In response, she noted that the settlement didn’t preclude criminal charges; it was just a modicum of justice. She thought “hush money” conveyed the wrong message. “It’s a negative term,” she said. (William Safire called it “always strongly pejorative.”) “There’s nothing inherently wrong, and there’s a lot that’s right, when two people want to settle a matter.”

 

Through the ages, hush money has nevertheless been associated with dirty dealing. Thucydides hinted at it disapprovingly, Dickens scorned the payee more than the payer, Dostoyevsky viewed it as a transaction on the road to Hell. Sweeney Todd was hit up for hush money by his tonsorial rival; he slit the guy’s throat instead.

 

In the real world, the power dynamics are often lopsided. An alarming number of silencers are Presidents and their ilk: Hamilton, Jefferson, John Edwards. J.F.K. paid hush money of sorts, in the form of political capital, to J. Edgar Hoover, who’d discovered one of his affairs. Warren Harding sent hush money every year to a spurned mistress in possession of his love letters, which featured recurring characters that included Jerry the Penis. “Wish I could take you to Mount Jerry,” Harding wrote in one. “Wonderful spot.”

 

On the Watergate tapes, discussing the burglars, Nixon may have uttered the phrase “hush money” to his adviser Charles W. Colson, or maybe just something that sounded like it. (“Shush, honey”?) Decades later, Trump was recorded discussing a different mistress with Cohen. Was that Trump saying “Pay with cash”? Giuliani, never one to self-hush, argued on Fox News that Trump actually said, “Don’t pay with cash.” Giuliani explained that he had experience with surreptitious recordings: “How about four thousand hours of Mafia people on tape? I know how to listen to them, I know how to transcribe them. I’ve dealt with much worse tapes than this.” Folly, vice. Cover thine eyes.

 

What’s a wrongdoer to do? A call was placed to Eric Dezenhall, a crisis-management specialist who has advised such clients as the Sacklers and Exxon-Mobil and who has consulted on scores of secret settlements. “One of the things you hear is, It’s the coverup that gets you,” Dezenhall said. “That’s not true! This shouldn’t be taken as something I advise or support, but coverups work all the time.”

 

Of course, they work only if the public doesn’t hear about them. “Twenty years ago, if you wrote somebody a check to stay quiet, it would stay quiet,” Dezenhall said. “The problem today is people take your money, and then they go on TV anyway.” Not all of them, though. Who knows what Dezenhall’s clients — billionaires, celebrities — have kept hushed up? Dezenhall does, but he couldn’t possibly say. ♦

 

********

 

When I get on my knees to say my prayers at night, I thank the Good Lord for giving us 45:  Not because I’m a zombie-eyed election denier. Nor because I support him over, say, rival Ron DeSantis for the 2024 GOP presidential nod. Nor even because I love watching him tweak the noses, time and again, of all those self-righteous pundits from across the political spectrum on TV. No, but rather, this: I’m thankful that he provides us with an unfailingly rich stream of pop-culture fodder that’s waaaay more interesting than Joe Biden’s faltering mental status ever could be. And visuals far more entertaining than RMN’s scowling post-Watergate visage ever provided anyone. Alright, I admit, Warren G. Harding’s immortal “Wish I could take you to Mount Jerry – Wonderful spot” is pretty good as quotes go – but still.

Truth to tell, I have never watched even a single episode of Celebrity .Apprentice, and I never hope to. But for keeping things interesting on a daily basis, there’s none finer anywhere on the national stage than DJT. I mean, c’mon: Who’d you rather see on your evening news, huh? Vlad the Impaler paired with a camo-clad one-time comedian named Volodymyr Zelensky? Or Don the Feckless and Inscrutable paired with a porn star named Stormy the Buxom clad only in minimalist blue-lace leisure attire? I for one am here to tell you: It’s no contest, folks. Not even close.

Oh, and also: “Shush, Honey.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *